Scarlett in Feb. Esquire Magazine
Moderator: Bob
- Suntory
- For Relaxing Times Make It Suntory Time!
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:28 am
- Location: Boston
Scarlett in Feb. Esquire Magazine
The photos are delicious!!!! A lot in B&W but just scrumptious!!!
Here is the article:
http://www.scarlettjohansson.org/articles/esquire05.php
Ah here we go, photos:
http://www.esquire.com/women/gallery/05 ... frame.html
Enjoy!
Here is the article:
http://www.scarlettjohansson.org/articles/esquire05.php
Ah here we go, photos:
http://www.esquire.com/women/gallery/05 ... frame.html
Enjoy!
- Just Like Honey...
- Suntory Time
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:56 pm
- Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada
It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...
Then again, people will do anything if you hand them enough money.
I must remind myself as well as everyone else that Scarlett isnt Charlotte.
But I sure wish she was..
Then again, people will do anything if you hand them enough money.
I must remind myself as well as everyone else that Scarlett isnt Charlotte.
But I sure wish she was..
LOLScarlett wrote:"I don't have half the fetishes I've read I have"
I'd rather be a gear in a big, deterministic, physical machine than just some random swerving.
- Suntory
- For Relaxing Times Make It Suntory Time!
- Posts: 272
- Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:28 am
- Location: Boston
You're right, what was I thinking?! It was the testoserone talking!Just Like Honey... wrote:It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...
From an artistic point of view it is very good photography.
Scarlett is compared to Marilyn Monroe and didn't Monroe do similer
kinds of photography posing as well? I think I would rather see her do this
than Playboy. I hope when she hits 40 she doesn't do playboy like all
the other starlets who do it to get back into show biz.
on one hand, i do agree with you, and i think that everyone in this forum, at least to some degree, would like her to be charlotte, myself included...Just Like Honey... wrote:It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...
on the other hand...have u SEEN the pics!??
but thats just the guy in me talking ....
"[quote:c3637b3b41="jml98"][quote:c3637b3b41="Just Like Honey..."]It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...[/quote:c3637b3b41]
on one hand, i do agree with you, and i think that everyone in this forum, at least to some degree, would like her to be charlotte, myself included...[/quote:c3637b3b41]
What the hell was a young Hollywood actress thinking, letting some rascal take sexy pictures of her? I just hope it doesn't hurt her career.
Please don't say "everyone...would like her to be charlotte". What on earth are you talking about?
We are seriously running out of things to talk about!"
on one hand, i do agree with you, and i think that everyone in this forum, at least to some degree, would like her to be charlotte, myself included...[/quote:c3637b3b41]
What the hell was a young Hollywood actress thinking, letting some rascal take sexy pictures of her? I just hope it doesn't hurt her career.
Please don't say "everyone...would like her to be charlotte". What on earth are you talking about?
We are seriously running out of things to talk about!"
Last edited by jm on Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Just Like Honey...
- Suntory Time
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:56 pm
- Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada
It sure won't hurt her career... that kind of thing is what the mainstream media is looking for these days...johnmonkey wrote:I just hope it doesn't hurt her career.
Oh well, at least most of the photos were in good taste, but of course they have to throw in a bit of subtle sleaze for the reason mentioned above.
I'd rather be a gear in a big, deterministic, physical machine than just some random swerving.
- phillygalinutah
- Lounge Singer
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 4:20 pm
- Location: Utah
Re: Scarlett in Esquire
Hi, I've been away from the LIT board (not intentionally). I started anew supervisory job in Jan, and was on vacation last week.
Oh, so some of you think the Esquire photos are delicious While my husband and I waited for our flights in LAX last weekend, I stopped in a magazine store, and spied a black and white cover of Scarlett and her hair color was black. I forget the magazine name, but it was a local LA magazine. Inside there were 8 or 10 B&W various poses of Scarlett exposing her "dark, sultry side". It was a very different racy look, but my hubby gave her photos the male seal of approval.
Maybe someone lives in the LA area, and has seen it.
Oh, so some of you think the Esquire photos are delicious While my husband and I waited for our flights in LAX last weekend, I stopped in a magazine store, and spied a black and white cover of Scarlett and her hair color was black. I forget the magazine name, but it was a local LA magazine. Inside there were 8 or 10 B&W various poses of Scarlett exposing her "dark, sultry side". It was a very different racy look, but my hubby gave her photos the male seal of approval.
Maybe someone lives in the LA area, and has seen it.
"Everyone wants to be found"
- The Shoegazer
- Japanese Surfer
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:56 pm
- Location: USA
Just Like Honey... wrote:It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...
Then again, people will do anything if you hand them enough money.
I must remind myself as well as everyone else that Scarlett isnt Charlotte.
But I sure wish she was..
LOLScarlett wrote:"I don't have half the fetishes I've read I have"
Well, sorry to say but sex sells. More so now than before and it IS sad that some actresses are the complete opposites of who they play in the movies. Many will agree that she was more beautiful in LiT because she had that humbleness and some things I can't pinpoint quite yet that made us fall in love with her. Don't get me wrong, she is still very talented and beautiful actress but true. Its better than playboy. I guess us LiT fans are outnumbered by those 'other' teenage and middle-aged fans who will run out to purchase the magazine just because she showed a bit more flesh. Thats kinda sad but what can you do. She is a big girl now . I admit, those are sexy pictures but I feel the likes of her and Anna Faris don't belong in those magazines.
Here we are, Stuck by this river