Scarlett in Feb. Esquire Magazine

Post appearances in the media including print, online, tv, radio, etc. for cast and crew.

Moderator: Bob

Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Suntory
For Relaxing Times Make It Suntory Time!
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:28 am
Location: Boston

Scarlett in Feb. Esquire Magazine

#1 Post by Suntory » Tue Feb 22, 2005 2:33 pm

The photos are delicious!!!! A lot in B&W but just scrumptious!!! :)

Here is the article:
http://www.scarlettjohansson.org/articles/esquire05.php

Ah here we go, photos:
http://www.esquire.com/women/gallery/05 ... frame.html

Enjoy!

Image Image

jml98
Asleep
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:37 pm

#2 Post by jml98 » Tue Feb 22, 2005 2:55 pm

:shock:
Image

User avatar
Just Like Honey...
Suntory Time
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:56 pm
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada

#3 Post by Just Like Honey... » Wed Feb 23, 2005 12:21 am

It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...

Then again, people will do anything if you hand them enough money.
I must remind myself as well as everyone else that Scarlett isnt Charlotte.

But I sure wish she was.. :wink:
Scarlett wrote:"I don't have half the fetishes I've read I have"
LOL :lol:
I'd rather be a gear in a big, deterministic, physical machine than just some random swerving.

User avatar
Suntory
For Relaxing Times Make It Suntory Time!
Posts: 271
Joined: Fri Apr 30, 2004 1:28 am
Location: Boston

#4 Post by Suntory » Wed Feb 23, 2005 11:38 am

Just Like Honey... wrote:It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...
You're right, what was I thinking?! It was the testoserone talking! :shock: :D :twisted:

From an artistic point of view it is very good photography.
Scarlett is compared to Marilyn Monroe and didn't Monroe do similer
kinds of photography posing as well? I think I would rather see her do this
than Playboy. I hope when she hits 40 she doesn't do playboy like all
the other starlets who do it to get back into show biz.

jml98
Asleep
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:37 pm

#5 Post by jml98 » Wed Feb 23, 2005 5:03 pm

Just Like Honey... wrote:It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...
on one hand, i do agree with you, and i think that everyone in this forum, at least to some degree, would like her to be charlotte, myself included...

on the other hand...have u SEEN the pics!?? :shock:

but thats just the guy in me talking .... :lol:
Image

jm
Inactive/Deleted user
Posts: 441
Joined: Sat May 01, 2004 1:10 am

#6 Post by jm » Thu Feb 24, 2005 5:16 pm

"[quote:c3637b3b41="jml98"][quote:c3637b3b41="Just Like Honey..."]It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...[/quote:c3637b3b41]
on one hand, i do agree with you, and i think that everyone in this forum, at least to some degree, would like her to be charlotte, myself included...[/quote:c3637b3b41]
What the hell was a young Hollywood actress thinking, letting some rascal take sexy pictures of her? I just hope it doesn't hurt her career.

Please don't say "everyone...would like her to be charlotte". What on earth are you talking about?

We are seriously running out of things to talk about!"
Last edited by jm on Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.

jml98
Asleep
Posts: 387
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 11:37 pm

#7 Post by jml98 » Thu Feb 24, 2005 10:19 pm

ok...so maybe it was a hasty generalization....haha :D
Image

User avatar
Just Like Honey...
Suntory Time
Posts: 398
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 10:56 pm
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada

#8 Post by Just Like Honey... » Fri Feb 25, 2005 12:42 am

johnmonkey wrote:I just hope it doesn't hurt her career.
It sure won't hurt her career... that kind of thing is what the mainstream media is looking for these days... :?

Oh well, at least most of the photos were in good taste, but of course they have to throw in a bit of subtle sleaze for the reason mentioned above.
I'd rather be a gear in a big, deterministic, physical machine than just some random swerving.

User avatar
phillygalinutah
Lounge Singer
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 4:20 pm
Location: Utah

Re: Scarlett in Esquire

#9 Post by phillygalinutah » Sat Mar 05, 2005 12:59 am

Hi, I've been away from the LIT board (not intentionally). I started anew supervisory job in Jan, and was on vacation last week.

Oh, so some of you think the Esquire photos are delicious :D While my husband and I waited for our flights in LAX last weekend, I stopped in a magazine store, and spied a black and white cover of Scarlett and her hair color was black. I forget the magazine name, but it was a local LA magazine. Inside there were 8 or 10 B&W various poses of Scarlett exposing her "dark, sultry side". It was a very different racy look, but my hubby gave her photos the male seal of approval.

Maybe someone lives in the LA area, and has seen it.
"Everyone wants to be found"

User avatar
The Shoegazer
Japanese Surfer
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 10:56 pm
Location: USA

#10 Post by The Shoegazer » Fri Mar 18, 2005 11:01 pm

Just Like Honey... wrote:It's kind of sad that she gave into that kind of sexually suggestive photography crap...

Then again, people will do anything if you hand them enough money.
I must remind myself as well as everyone else that Scarlett isnt Charlotte.

But I sure wish she was.. :wink:
Scarlett wrote:"I don't have half the fetishes I've read I have"
LOL :lol:


Well, sorry to say but sex sells. More so now than before and it IS sad that some actresses are the complete opposites of who they play in the movies. Many will agree that she was more beautiful in LiT because she had that humbleness and some things I can't pinpoint quite yet that made us fall in love with her. Don't get me wrong, she is still very talented and beautiful actress but true. Its better than playboy. I guess us LiT fans are outnumbered by those 'other' teenage and middle-aged fans who will run out to purchase the magazine just because she showed a bit more flesh. Thats kinda sad but what can you do. She is a big girl now . I admit, those are sexy pictures but I feel the likes of her and Anna Faris don't belong in those magazines.
Here we are, Stuck by this river

Post Reply